Monday, October 31, 2011

What’s Philosophy Got to Do with Construction?

 I recently visited the Green Idea House in Hermosa Beach (http://www.greenideahouse.com/), which will be a beautiful contemporary custom home that is net zero energy.  There are several categories of zero-energy houses, but this one is “net zero”, meaning that balanced out through the year, the home will use no more energy than it generates.  It may draw off the grid during peak times, but will return that much and more back to the grid over the course of the year.

To get to “net zero”, they are building a tight building envelope with energy-efficient windows, blown-in cellulose insulation, an efficient heat pump water heater, and plenty of PV cells on the roof.  This would be enough to make the project remarkable in this region.  But these homeowners have taken the project much farther, to the point of making it an intellectual and philosophical challenge.

The Fortunatos, owners of the home, are blogging about the experience of building their home this way.  Perhaps because of the full disclosure of every decision they make, they are taking the time to dig deeply into the pros and cons of each design decision and material choice. They would like to help others think about how decisions they make for their home should be dictated by their specific lifestyle. And there are some eye-opening conclusions on their website for you to consider in building your own home.

For instance, installing tankless water heaters and solar thermal panels has become a common practice in green home building.  Instead, the family chose a multi-tank solution that first pre-conditions the city water to ambient temperature, which at the beach is quite often 75 degrees, a savings of 20 degrees worth of energy use.  Then they utilize a new technology heat pump that has efficiencies far in excess of traditional gas burners used in tank and tankless heaters.  While tankless water heaters have widespread advantages in certain situations, there are no one-size-fits-all solutions in green building.  The owners thought about water heating in terms of how best to support their lifestyle and generate return on investment; in their case – 3 people who are often out of town travelling – a solar thermal system and tankless water heater were not the answer.

The building design also takes into account orientation to the sun to keep sun out in cooling periods and welcome it in during heating periods.  The southern exposure is the culmination of this philosophical debate.  Using quantitative models, they arrived at a 5-foot overhang over the windows on the front of the house, carefully calculated to shade the building from the sun in summer (high up in the sky) and to allow the sun to heat a thermal mass wall in the master bedroom during winter (when the sun is low in the sky).  Decisions like this can save significant amounts of energy, and are modeled by Energy Soft when an energy consultant evaluates a project.  Every window is entered into the model with a specific compass orientation and overhang dimensions, so that passive energy use can be considered.

The homeowners are also looking deeply into the insulation design on their project.  Once the solar arrays had been specified and they knew the energy their home would produce, they could design the building envelope to release only a known amount of energy.  They settled on blown-in cellulose insulation between the framing members (many of which are reused 2x4s), for an R-value of about 13.  Rather than install foam on the exterior of the framing, commonly known as Continuous Insulation or CI, they determined that vapor permeability of wall systems is a desirable feature for air quality and mold resistance.  Their search for an energy efficient alternative to foam insulation led them to fiber board, a natural vapor-permeable material that adds an R-value of 2.6 for every inch of thickness.  Together with the blown-in insulation, their wall systems achieve an insulation value sufficient to realize their goal of “net zero”, together with all the other good decisions they have made throughout the house.

Next they had to choose an exterior cladding system that is attractive and protects the building from the elements.  They determined early on that they wanted to incorporate recycled content into their project, while minimizing embodied energy (the energy used to produce the materials in their home) and minimizing energy loss through the walls.  They are using metal panels on parts of the building, and plaster elsewhere.  The plaster will incorporate recycled content from locally-sourced recycled concrete aggregate and flyash.  The flyash question is a debate in and of itself, with questions of heavy metals, coal-fired power plants, and long-term maintenance to consider.  As with every other decision on the house, the Fortunatos considered all the angles in deciding whether to use materials that incorporate flyash and divert it from landfills.

Build Smart Group advised the owners on plaster material decisions, including fiber-reinforced base coats with recycled content, color coat stucco finishes based on recycled aggregates, and lime plasters with lower embodied energy than cement-based alternatives (and stunning good looks).  Merlex Stucco’s website is a good source of inspiration in this area http://www.merlex.com/sustainable_stucco_how_to.htm.
 Interior surfaces will take indoor air quality into account, which is one of the easiest areas to build green today, thanks to the tireless R&D work by the nation’s paint companies.  Plaster products can also produce zero VOC performance with added aesthetics, and some even claim to actively clean the air.  Indoor climate control was also a consideration that led to selection of National Gypsum’s brand new phase change drywall.  These drywall panels contain tiny wax beads that change phases right around room temperature.  During the daytime, the encapsulated wax material melts, which absorbs heat from the indoor space.  As the liquid cools down along with the house in the evening, the wax returns to solid form and releases heat.  In this manner, the phase-change materials of PCMs act to regulate room temperature and reduce heating and cooling load on the HVAC system.  The Green Idea House calculates that master bedroom energy use will be cut in half through the use of these PCM drywall panels!

This project should serve as an inspiration to all green-minded homeowners to carefully consider how their new home fits their lifestyle.  Rather than leaving the key decisions up to design professionals working in a vacuum, owners should fully inform their design teams of their values and lifestyle and what green means to them.  After all, for those blessed with the resources to create the home of their dreams, a home should say “This is our home.  This is who we are.”

Merlex Stucco is continually improving its product line of natural stucco products to add products offering (1) energy efficiency; (2) recycled content; (3) local sourcing; and (4) reduced embodied energy. Products to be included on the Green Idea House Case Study include 33% Recycled Stucco (based on recycled concrete aggregate), and Vero Antiqua lime plaster (from Merlex's Vero Venetian plaster subsidiary), which has 28% lower embodied energy than cement stucco and incorporates 65% recycled marble aggregate. Merlex & Vero are pleased to support the Fortunatos, who are kindred spirits in their quest to find the most sustainable choices in products that fit their lifestyle.


Tuesday, October 18, 2011

BONDERS

There are three main types of glues used in the construction industry. Concrete Glues (Poly Vinyl Acetates), high end bonding agents (Ethyl Vinyl Acetates), and Acrylics. I am convinced these products are used interchangeably and incorrectly most of the time. I have seen contractors putting acrylics on the wall to bond mud or stucco. I have seen them pour Concrete glue in the mixer to modify the mix and add strength. These guys have been using these products wrong for so long that they are convinced they are right! I have called these guys on this many times and the reaction is the same: “I have been doing this for 20 years”! My gut is that this actually does work to some degree. The logical conclusion is that these are all glues and would react whether in the mix or on the wall. However, there is a right way to do things. Acrylics are always admixtures. They modify and strengthen the material they are added to. Acrylics allow the cement in brown coat, stucco, thin set, or any other cement based product to cure longer and therefore denser. The closer (denser) the molecules the harder (higher Psi) and also the better water resistance you will get. Acrylic admixtures can react differently depending on the weather. Guys used to tell me they didn’t like using acrylics because they “spike” the mud. That is, make it set-up more quickly. My teacher told me it made the material cure longer and therefore stronger and better. So which is it? I called my guru and he said the answer is both! When the weather is over about 85°F to 90°F acrylics can set the material more quickly. This is why we recommend using PVA or EVA on the wall instead. The other truth about acrylics is that the price difference between them has to do with percentage of solids. Some companies add more water than others. So it holds true here that “you get what you pay for”. Some very inexpensive acrylics probably have solids in the low teens and the good ones like Merlex Acrylex are in the high 20% to low 30%. This can be triple the amount of actual chemical that does the job!

PVA’s and EVA’s are another source of confusion. These always go on the receiving surface. They are used on the wall if there is a “bond issue”. That is, if there is something on the wall that inhibits suction. Suction is what causes subsequent material to bond to the last material. As in stucco to brown coat or stucco over stucco. So if there is a bond-breaker like paint, sealers, oil, dirt, synthetic stucco, or any other material that inhibits bond then glue should be applied to the surface. The two main characteristic differences are PVA’s re-emulsify. This means they can become a liquid again after drying. That can be good if you are coming back later to apply the coating or it can be bad if you apply the coating and it rains and the coating slides off the wall! EVA’s do not re-emulsify and are best to use if there is any chance of rain or moisture within 72 hours. Again these chemicals are cut with water and the percentage of solids can be very low. Be careful of inexpensive glues and best to trust name brands. Contractors seem to love Weld-Crete®. It is a great product and very high in solids. Weld-Crete is a PVA and will re-emulsify. Mighty Bond from Merlex is a high solid PVA and the price is in the mid range. Merlex also makes an EVA called Superhold that is the best bonder on the market. It has a blue tint to it so you can see where it is (or isn’t) on the wall. It is towards the high end in price but is high in solids and is the right chemical to use outside.
Soka University - Laguna Niguel, CA

So what is the answer? Is it best to use acrylic in the mix to insure bond or put an EVA on the wall or both? The answer is both. The acrylic in the mix will stick to the EVA on the wall for a chemical bond in lieu of a suction bond. You can get away with either but the acrylic must be dispersed properly in the mix, and the bonding agent must be on every square inch of the wall to bond. With both materials there is that much greater probability for success.

I hope that this can help clear up the use (mis-use) of bonding agents in the field. Reality is that whomever reading this is NOT the plastering contractor. More likely it is a homeowner that will have the onerous task of telling the stucco guy his job…. This never seems to go well!